One more round of applause for Rally & Broad.
March’s session was really excellent. McGuire, a slam poetry exponent from Glasgow, kicked off proceedings with some whimsical stuff about the cosy joys of bed before whacking the audience round the head with two excoriating LGBT treatises. He describes the first, ‘Homosexuality’, as a ‘really bad sociology essay’, and the second, ‘Glasgow Boys’, unpicks the lives of gay Glaswegian men and the conflict with traditional, Glasgow macho hypocrisy. Both are pretty damned terrific.
Kirstin Innes, of WMP fame, reads two lovely sections from her upcoming novel. In one, a young escort describes her first punt, and she captures the unremarkableness of it all beautifully. The other is a slice of teenage school life, a scary, neddish, hyper-sexualised outsider getting his come-uppance from a rather sorted young woman. Innes has a lovely, delicate, mannered voice and way with words. The novel’s out next year; it’ll be great.
Jenny Lindsay reads her love letter from Julia to Winston, which is a hugely powerful piece, and Rachel McCrum reads the gorgeous title poem from her pamphlet, ‘The Glassblower Dances’. Both are fast becoming two of my favourite Scottish poets of the moment, even if Rachel is Irish.
The final acts are really the icing on the cake. Genesee is a Kenyan-born singer songwriter who is wonderful. She begins with an a capella gospel song that evokes shivers down the spine – here it is from her set at The Glad Café the very next night – that introduces a lovely set, including her own composition ‘Hope’ one of my favourite songs of the year so far.
Final act is South African poet, educator and activist Toni Stuart. Her work is suffused with musicality of tone and rhythm – indeed, many of her poems include song – and she uses them to tell us about aspects of South African life, from the intimacy of eating avocados to huge issues of colonialism. ‘Cello’s Lament’ is particularly pretty, and I’m chuffed when I buy a book bag with an extract handwritten on it, proceeds of which go to a library book buying project for underprivileged schools. I’ll probably do something extremely nerdy with it, like stick it in a frame…
Next month sees me take the stage, along with Amy Shipway (who is dong wonderful things with National Collective). Come along – Rally & Broad really is the coolest night out…
Rally & Broad’s second Glasgow outing is as cool and classy as last month’s, though very different in tone. Rachel McCrum sets us off with an in-yer-face, angry poke in the eye for Russ Meyer’s rampant misogyny that came wrapped up in fluffy notions of fun and winking titles like ‘Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill!’ She’s quite right; the guy was an abominable sleaze merchant, even adjusting for that dubious notion that ‘things were different then’. Yeah. Like Jimmy Savile. Good on you, girl…
First up is Glasgow poet Sam Small, who’s organiser for the very interesting new Inn Deep monthly poetry show. He’s described as a ‘firebrand’, which means he delivers everything at breakneck speed in a very loud voice, whether it’s a brilliantly intricate tale of yawning, scientific research and hard drugs or a well-meaning treatise on victim-blaming in rape that begins startlingly powerfully but ends a wee bit predictably. He’s very talented; I’d just like a bit of space and time now and again to engage and have my own dialogue with this work.
Leo Glaister is a hoot. He inhabits the persona of a geeky scientist involved in shady dimension-hopping research. It’s remarkably unsettling, the audience unsure at first just where this oddball is coming from; but once we’re all going with the flow, it’s packed with jokes and really stunning images. He’s a veteran of the slam circuit, it seems; not surprising at all.
Jenny Lindsay then delivers just the kind of poem Sam Small takes the gentle piss out of in his cheeky but undeniably funny dismemberment of a certain style of poetry reading (‘I’ll repeat this line to make it seem important…’) – and it’s absolutely gorgeous. I really love her writing. It’s largely an extended descriptive piece about an Edinburgh district undergoing gentrification (no, Jenny, I don’t know Edinburgh well enough to spot it) and it’s really beautiful to hear a poet who loves words and the feel they make in the mouth and the sound they make on the ear. “We live where pigeons come to die…” says the narrator’s mother, and I just about fell off my chair at that one.
After the interval, star of the night is Martin O’Connor, who I last saw at WPM on the Water in December. He’s even more impressive this time round. I think he must listen to people more carefully than any other human being on the planet, so perfect is the way he captures accent and idiom. He performs ‘First Lines’ again, and it’s characters are instantly identifiable. He also performs sections of his upcoming one man show, Theology; honestly, go – it’s a must see. If there’s anyone doing anything more interesting with the Scots language just now, I haven’t heard them. Loved it.
Final act of the night is young singer songwriter Becci Wallace. She’s just finished her music degree, apparently, and is putting together an album. She’s terrific. The way she delivers her second number, ‘She’s So…’ is outstanding. What’s so obvious too is how literate her lyrics are; this is a young woman who knows her words and plays with them really intelligently. I’m going to recommend her for Sofar: I think she’d go down a storm.
Just a wee reminder I’ll be performing at the 30th of April Rally & Broad (despite Jenny trying to convince me it’s March I’m pencilled in for); come along. The audience was a bit sparse this time (no Liz Lochead on the bill?) and that’s a shame, because this is a class night. Of course, I’ll be guaranteed to lower that tone…
So, the coolest literary salon on the planet, Rally & Broad, comes to Glasgow. Excellent.
Jenny Lindsay and Rachel McCrum have been running Rally & Broad for a couple of years now from their home in Edinburgh. It’s been making waves, regularly appearing in the press as the place to be. It’s building an unstoppable momentum, it seems, with a flurry of complementary events keeping the poets busy almost 24/7; it’s only a few days since an Edinburgh installment, after all.
Word has got around, it seems, and a good crowd turns out for Kirsty Logan, Declan Welsh and the ever wonderful Makar Liz Lochead. Lindsay and McCrum are gorgeous and charming and both are really terrific poets. McCrum’s ‘Bird Man’ reimagines the legend of Elpenor, that daft, hungover lad who broke his neck falling off the roof of Circe’s house and who nagged Ulysses in Hades to give him a proper burial, and it’s a poignant tale of loss and regret. Lindsay’s ‘I promise I will not fall in love with you’ is magnificent writing. She spins the story of a manipulative late night text from a new boyfriend into a meditation on the process of love in the 21st century juxtaposed with the mores of 50 years ago. The playfulness and lack of commitment we bring to our relationships leads to , ultimately, emptiness, but it’s her description of the norms of my childhood that she nails so startlingly. People dated, married, filled their lives with babies almost as a default, often resulting in misery, and in her portrayal of a woman wrecked by depression and feelings of self-worthlessness and frustration that only another baby might even hope to solve, she transports me immediately back to my childhood, and the black dog that haunted my own mother. It really is fabulous writing, especially as Lindsay’s too young to know all that.
Kirsty Logan is as perchink as ever; her first collection, “The Rental Heart” (a lovely wee story she impressed me with at WPM5) is out next month. She reads three short pieces – she is well known for flash fiction – and it’s as prettily crafted as always. Declan Welsh is a young singer / songwriter from East Kilbride. He’s of the witty, cynical working-class tradition and his songs are about instantly recognisable lives of the young, including the excellent ‘Common People’-like ‘She’s From Bearsden‘. Good stuff.
The inimitable Liz Lochead rounds off the evening. She’s really at the top of her game nowadays; as a celebration of Burns, she reads ‘To A Mouse’, and then spins off into her own epic consideration of Burns as a poet and a man, all inspired by finding a live mouse in a wok or under the bed, like a wee bit of living oose. She revisits her classic ‘Life of Mrs Reilly’, the poignant monologue of a typical working class woman and her typical working class marriage, a mixture of joy and unfulfillment just like any other. She celebrates the Scottish aunty and finishes off with ‘Old Vinyl’, in which she nostalgically celebrates my record collection’s power to tell the narrative of existence. Such good fun.
So – a big thumbs up for the first Glesca Rally & Broad; the franchise is growing, and so it should. It’s on for the next six months; they’ve kindly given me a slot on the 30th of April, so come along if you need a bit of Glasgow dirty realist miserablism to counteract the influence of the lighter nights coming in. I’m looking forward to it already…
Derek McLuckie was a contemporary of mine in the fabulous Paisley Writers’ Group of the 1990s. This was a weekly meeting of some of the most talented writers I’ve ever worked with, including Suhayl Saadi (a good friend whose “Psychoraag” is one of the most imaginative Scottish novels of the last 15 years), Graham Fulton (more of him later), Margaret Fulton Cook, Marion Arnott (A Silver Dagger winner) and Alasdair MacKinnon (one of the most elegant poets I’ve read).
Led by Agnes Owens, Gerrie Fellows, Kathryn Heyman and, finally, Ajay Close, it was an absolute hot-house of intense productivity. Work was torn apart, fought over, picked to pieces – and always came out the other end of that process at least twice as good. I’d never have written what I have written if it wasn’t for their influence, and I’ve never found a group like it since. Truly exciting times.
Derek appeared in the mid-90’s. He brought a different twist to the group perspective, which was pretty much embedded in a brutalist realism. Derek’s was a world of violence and sweat and sex that was unflinching and vivid. It was so out there, so in your face, and Derek’s dramatic core simply emphasised that. Gay orgies, casual sex followed by casual beatings, grubby rites of passage, industrial quantities of illegal substances: nothing was beyond him. I always thought I was an honest, frank writer: Derek took the biscuit, shoved it into his gob, chewed it up and spat it back out at you. He was a fantastically promising talent.
I haven’t seen him for over ten years, so it was with huge interest I accidentally discovered this performance at the Tron. It covers many of the issues he dealt with in his writing back then, developed into a powerhouse monologue that was his trademark style when I was on the same bill as him. Nowadays, every writer who can read from a sheet of paper advertises themselves as a “performer”: I’ve always considered myself a pretty good reader, and Derek, as a trained actor, just wiped the floor with me because he knows what performance is all about.
This is a terrific hallucinogenic roller-coaster ride, full of wild buzzing involving Greek myths, religious iconography and a fair dash of Barbie. The adolescent pull of glue is really well done, not so much an escape as a heightening. There are lots of real laughs that point to real truths, as well as blood in bucketfuls. Of course, though, it’s all about sex, the gay teen tortured by desire for his pals; it’s not the glue that woos the narrator away from the Evangelical religion of his family, it’s the boys.
That is the source of the greatest poignancy in the performance. A teenage pyjamaed fumbling with the one pal he truly loves is genuinely touching, while the other – more dangerous and full of testosterone – attempts to rape him using Germoline as a lubricant. The final minutes of the performance, as the narrator sits torn and bleeding in a bus shelter and invokes the spirit of Judy Garland as his saviour, are quite something.
Good to see Derek in fine form, as ever.
I’ve written about Edwin Morgan before, one of Scotland’s greatest writers, and one of humanity’s most humane men. This new play about his last days in a Glasgow nursing home is written by his friend and successor as Makar, Liz Lochead, herself a great poet and quite brilliant dramatist.
It centres on Morgan’s final days in a Glasgow care home and his relationship with his biographer / friend James McGonigal. As the physical and mental frailty take hold, Morgan is tortured by fears that he is losing the ability to write and by constant nightmares. In a life-affirming act of artistic defiance, McGonigal and Morgan shape and beat those terrible symptoms into a final triumphant collection of poetry, “Dreams and Other Nightmares.”
It’s a bit of a curate’s egg of a play (although it is described in the programme as a “new piece for theatre”, which suggests it isn’t meant to be looked at in any traditional sense). As Morgan’s past unravels before us, there are undeniably poignant moments: Morgan’s brief encounter on a bus with a half-drunk tough which promises so much but has to end after fifteen minutes because his ticket won’t take him past the next stop; watching “The Golden Shot” with his long-time lover, John Scott; the utterly bereft grief he suffers when he learns of Scott’s death a year after they had separated (again). Many of these moments are built around Morgan’s poetry (“Strawberries” features heavily in a scene with Scott), as are those moments when we glimpse the risk-taking Morgan, the man who trawled gay meeting places like Green’s Playhouse or Glasgow Green; “I couldn’t not take risks,” he says, even after the nightmare of the rape scene which sent shock waves through Scottish society when it was published forty years ago. You can see Morgan reading it to secondary students here: Glasgow Green.
However, it suffers a little from the same issues I noted in “Hit Me!” last year. The character of James speaks directly to the audience, revealing biographical details, dates of publication, etc. that are all interesting but, for me, rather mediate the dramatic experience for the audience: as such, we see Morgan through those eyes and not through our own. I wanted more of Morgan’s dreams and nightmares, wanted to hear more of his voice, wanted to become better acquainted with his “life force” that tops and tails the script, and I wanted him to speak directly to me.
But it’s a solid, interesting memorial by a fine dramatist. The production is thoughtful too – Morgan’s care home room looks more like a Soviet era prison cell – and the actors are well up to the job. Davie McKay as Morgan brings out an innocence and occasionally irritating vulnerability that no doubt characterised the poet at the end of his life, and there are glimpses of the tetchiness and ego that members of the public like me rarely saw. It’s also nice to see two actors I’ve worked with. Lewis Howden, who plays James, has a lovely, authoritative presence on both stage and film: he played Tulloch in the BBC Education drama I wrote on “The Cone Gatherers”, and I thought he captured the character’s humanity and solidity very well. You can see him in the programme here.
Great too to see Steven Duffy, who played a central role in “The Practicality of Magnolia”. Steven was terrific, and the on screen relationship he struck up with Sheila Hancock was utterly convincing. You can see him in a clip from it here. Steven and Sheila and the wonderful work of Clara Glynn and the crew created a film that was a hundred times better than I could ever have imagined: I owe them eternal thanks. Steven is also a terrific stage actor: I last saw him playing Biff in “Death of a Salesman”, a hugely difficult part he tackled with ease. In this play, he multi-tasks various characters – John Scott, Morgan’s final “muse” Mark Smith, various shady men, care home employees – and as such provides the texture necessary to hold the drama together, which means he has a tremendous influence. It’s no exaggeration to say that the audience watches him whenever he appears, which is evidence of his powerful stage presence.
A lovely way to spend an afternoon.
Gretchen Parlato has impeccable musical roots (her dad played bass on various Zappa albums) and a quiet, elegant confidence in her abilities. Quite rightly, too.
Her voice isn’t especially remarkable in terms of its range and power, I think, but it’s rich and warm and engaging. However, the real talent is in her hugely literate interpretative skills: she does a gorgeous version of “Holding Back the Years” (no, really, it’s great), and she knows how to use her voice as an instrumental part of the whole band. Consequently, the interplay between her and her musicians (led by the excellent pianist Taylor Eigsti, and not Mark Guiliana as I originally blogged; thanks to Karen Kennedy for the correction below) is seamless and rewarding, especially on very complex numbers like “Circling”.
She’s also capable of lovely playfulness, such as on bassist Alan Hampton’s composition “Still”, or when using her mouth percussively on an African-tinged arrangement of the Brazilian “Alô, Alô”, probably the highlight of the set because it’s so light and vivacious. When the accompaniment is stripped to the piano, as on “Me and You” and “How We Love”, she’s capable of eliciting a few shivers too.
The overriding impression is one of real class, and of a young woman completely in control of her domain. Good on the Glasgow Jazz Festival for booking a real gem.
Rule number one of theatre going: go. If you don’t, you might miss a gem
Of course, the flip side of that is that you may have to sift through a few pebbles first, and unfortunately this is an experience of that ilk. There’s no denying the power of the subject matter – volunteer nurses on the WW1 battlefield – but unfortunately the drama does little with its potentially fascinating characters.
First, there are too many storylines. Ailsa the matricidal working class girl, Millicent the bonking toff, Lily the mad widow; each in their own right might tell a story worthy of a play (my money would be on Lily’s) but together none are explored deeply enough for us to have any great empathy with them. This isn’t helped by them speaking in odd, fractured images, and occasionally the words are pretty much overegged. Talking of a gun pointed at her by the rather creepy John, Lily says:
“It’s just a piece of metal: it’s not a crying child. It doesn’t scare me the way a crying child scares me. That’s what you don’t know about us, the women out here, doing what we do in the middle of this war: the only thing that scares us is a crying child”
Stated once, the idea is neat and effective; twice is perhaps a little clumsy: three times, and I’m liable to say, “I get it already!” There are also some quite clumsy, gauche lines, such as
“I’ll build you a home… That way I can put love in the rafters.”
All in all, the dialogue comes across as somewhat obtuse – the characters rarely seem to really speak to each other – which has the unsettling effect of a play that is aiming for realism and hyper-realism at the same time in a stylistic tug of war.
The play also relies on more and more implausible images to create any sort of emotional engagement. I would love to have had some sympathy for Ailsa, but she goes apeshit so speedily we never get to know what she was like before the madness strikes, and all that is left is the sight of her, apron stained in gore, cuddling dead bodies and dragging a cart laden with them across the stage, her howling amplified and distorted to uncomfortable levels. If the effect is to create the impression of a demented Mother Courage, it’s a bit of a blunderbuss approach.
Abigail Docherty is obviously an up and coming playwright, with many theatre and film credits to her name. However, this play just didn’t work for me by a long way. It is based on the diaries of real women on the Front, and I can’t help feeling that if they had been allowed to tell their stories, it would have been much more engaging and poignant, without all the explosions and flashing lights and hysteria. It should have been an emotionally exhausting experience: in reality, it was a bit intellectually irritating.
A month of a total lack of culture thanks to heaps of marking ends with a visit to see a version of the Pullitzer-prize winning play by John Patrick Shanley. Recently made into a Meryl Streep and Philip Seymour Hoffman film, the story of a power struggle and possible sexual abuse in the Catholic Church is obviously hugely topical, even though it is set in 1964. Father Flynn is accused of “interfering” with the first black boy at an exclusive private school by the overbearing Sister Aloysius, in the process ending the innocence of young Sister James.
It’s a cracker of a story, sure, but it doesn’t quite work for me. The vindictiveness of the elder nun seems to lack context, and the priest, faced with such a flimsy case against him, buckles too easily, accepting a promotion to move him away from the impending turmoil. As a result, the play finishes good half hour too early and with too many unanswered questions – which is perhaps why it’s called “Doubt”…
The set is gorgeous, utilising the Tron’s original stained glass windows to create the hushed interior of a church. The cast is adequate. Alison Peebles is suitably malicious as the school principal, looking like a malevolent Michelle Pfeiffer, but she stumbles with lines occasionally (one paragraph becomes unintelligible as she fights to make sense and make the cue), while Keith Fleming is a little too unctuous as the priest and Phyllis Livingston is given little to do despite having the potentially juicy part of the dilemma-ridden mother. Best of all is Sally Reid as the naive Sister James. She has the right face and manner of the ingenue teacher and nun, scared stiff by authority and willing to say anything to please either Sister Aloysius or Father Flynn. Her development into her own thinking entity as she realises the injustice that has been done is the most believable aspect of the play.
However, overall it’s a bit of a disappointment. Whether editing decisions have been made or whether the script really is that pat is beside the point: I left feeling short changed by a potentially rivetting story about potentially rivetting characters.